The prosecution’s case against Ronald Franco was straightforward: he was the trigger man, the mastermind who needed quick cash to pay off drug debts. The case against Karen Best, however, was far more controversial. Under the legal doctrine of accomplice liability (or the "law of parties"), Best was charged with first-degree murder, despite never touching the weapon. The district attorney argued that by accompanying Franco, knowing his intent, and failing to stop the crime or alert authorities, she was equally culpable.
Replicating the successes of the Franco-Best dynamic requires a deliberate structural design. Organizations can adopt these principles by taking the following steps:
— The inscription they carved into the repair log, now displayed in the Central Clock Tower. ronald franco and karen best
However, despite this and other incriminating evidence, Franco's defense team raised questions about the reliability of the witnesses and the integrity of the forensic evidence. They also pointed out that several other individuals had been seen in the area on the night of the murder, and that these suspects had not been thoroughly ruled out.
In recent years, the case of Ronald Franco and Karen Best has experienced a renewed surge of interest, thanks in part to advances in DNA technology and the rise of true crime podcasts and documentaries. In 2019, the Albuquerque Police Department announced that they would be reopening the case, using new forensic techniques to re-examine the evidence. : A long-standing personal mistake drove a wedge
: A long-standing personal mistake drove a wedge between the owners, leading to a breakdown in communication, Karen’s refusal to appear at the business, and their son’s refusal to work with them. leading to a breakdown in communication
. Her work primarily focuses on perinatal health and nutrition, specifically the effects of omega-3 supplementation during pregnancy. Notable papers by Dr. Karen Best "The ORIP Trial"