The trial court originally denied bail, but the Delhi High Court later granted bail to Bajaj, acknowledging that there was no prima facie evidence linking him to the creation or direct publication of the pornography. Legislative Impact: The Overhaul of India's IT Act
: Ravi Raj, a 23-year-old fourth-year student at the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Kharagpur, obtained the clip. Operating under the username "Alice Electronics," he listed the video for sale on the online auction website Baazee.com on November 27, 2004.
The legal proceedings eventually reached the Supreme Court of India. In a groundbreaking precedent, the judiciary recognized that strict vicarious criminal liability could not be automatically pinned on company directors under the existing architecture of the IT Act unless specific target provisions allowed for corporate piercing. Bajaj was eventually cleared of the primary charges, but the case highlighted massive gaps in the law. dps rk puram mms scandal 2004 34
On December 9, 2004, the tabloid TODAY (owned by India Today) published an exclusive report detailing how pornography involving school-aged children was being openly monetized online. School Disciplinary Actions and Campus Backlash
It quickly moved from infrared transfers to the burgeoning world wide web. The Viral Explosion The trial court originally denied bail, but the
The final group focuses on the meta-story. They point out that many people claiming to have seen the video are lying. They argue that the "viral video" has become an urban legend—with some clips being old pornography unrelated to DPS, and others being completely fabricated using deep-fake technology. They ask the hard question: Does the video even exist in the way the whisper network claims it does?
The recent social media discussion and "viral video" mentions regarding Delhi Public School (DPS), R.K. Puram The legal proceedings eventually reached the Supreme Court
The scandal escalated from a localized school issue into a corporate and legal crisis when the video surfaced on , which was India’s largest online auction and trading portal at the time (owned by global e-commerce giant eBay). A user under a specific member ID listed the video for sale under the title "DPS girls having fun," charging just under $3 (approximately ₹125 at the time) per download.
The "viral video" in question (reports suggest there were actually multiple clips in circulation, though the primary one is now legally suppressed) allegedly depicted students engaged in inappropriate behavior within the school premises. However, in the chaotic world of social media, the content of the video quickly became secondary to the meta-discussion about censorship.
Mobile phones were strictly banned or regulated in schools nationwide.